Showing posts with label Heidtmann. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Heidtmann. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 12, 2018

The Skeleton in the Yard

Let's step back to May 1902, when the J spur was being laid from the main EJ&E line through Hobart to the brickyards. That construction work led to an interesting discovery:

2018-9-12. Bones, Gazette, 5-9-1902
(Click on image to enlarge)

"Mr. Colburn" was, I believe, the 64-year-old Zerah Colburn, who had come to the Hobart area circa 1843 with his parents (Early Land Sales, Lake County) and lived out the rest of his life here. For Cruther I think we should read Carothers — and we have already mentioned that family in connection with the bridge on the tumbling dam. The young man who died in 1854 must have been John Carothers, Jr.; at that time he would have been about 17 years old.

I have found no follow-up story in later issues of the newspaper, so it is possible that young John's bones still lie in that box along the route of the vanished J spur.

We know the route:

J Spur on map with labels
(Click on image to enlarge)
Image courtesy of the Hobart Historical Society.


The spur actually extended as far as the western Kulage brickyard (see 1902 Sanborn map), which I find interesting because that part of the brickyards was on land once owned by the Carothers family. The image below shows that area as it appears on the 1874 Plat Map, with the east half of the southeast quarter of Section 30 owned by "Crothers." In 1846 John Carothers, Sr. had bought the parcel outlined in green, and in 1851 the parcel outlined in red (Early Land Sales, Lake County). He must have sold the green parcel before 1874.

2018-9-12. Carothers 1874
(Click on image to enlarge)

However, I doubt that young John's bones lie in that land. Zerah Colburn said John was "buried upon his … father's lot" — which sounds like a (relatively) small lot in town. In further support of this theory, the "Heitmann place" was likely in town, if we assume it was one of the two Heidtmann households shown in the 1900 Census. That census records one household composed of Fred and Liddie Heidtmann and their children, and a separate household where Fred's mother, Sophia, lived with her own elderly mother and an unmarried son. Both homes were within "Hobart Town," but I don't know the exact location of either. The one that included Sophia was probably on Michigan Avenue: it was described that way when Sophia died in 1909[1], and its being recorded in the 1900 Census next to the Melin home (northeast corner of Michigan and Cleveland) suggests they were neighbors. However, even if that Heidtmann place was on the west side of Michigan Avenue — with a railroad track and a creek between it and the J spur's route, to call the excavation "below the Heitmann place" seems a bit of a stretch.

♦    ♦    ♦

It's odd that Zerah Colburn would say that in 1854 Hobart had no cemetery. I suppose he meant no cemetery within the village. Zerah's own parents are buried in the Old Settlers Cemetery, and both died before John Carothers, Jr.: his father, Allen, in 1843, and his mother, Maria, in 1851. Still, in 1854, small family burial grounds on private property were not so very unusual, although I would expect such grounds to be more rural — a burial in a town lot would be out of the ordinary.

_______________
[1] "Old Citizen Dies," Hobart Gazette, May 14, 1909.

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Two Generations? Three? (Unidentified Glass-Plate Image)

9/1/2018 update — We have a tentative identification for these men from Diann Van Stright House, who says: "I believe they are: standing, Louis Heidtmann (1864-1937), sitting on right, Fred Heidtmann (1861-1935) (Sophia [Gousloff Heidtmann]'s sons, names may be switched) and the man on the left I believe is Frances [Heidtmann's] husband, Adam Diedrich (1862-1903)" — Adam being Diann's great-grandfather. After all, this is not a multi-generational portrait; these men are each other's contemporaries.

Adam Diedrich died in January 1903 (Indiana Death Certificates), so if he is in this photo, I am probably wrong in assigning a date of "not before 1905" to the related photo of the four generations of women. Surely the men's and women's portraits were taken on the same occasion.

Adam, a Catholic, is buried in Ss. Peter and Paul Cemetery, while his wife, a Lutheran, is buried in Hobart Cemetery.




Two Generations, Who Knows
(Click on image to enlarge)
Image courtesy of the Hobart Historical Society.


Posing in front of that familiar painted lady, here we see the menfolk appertaining to the four generations of women we saw previously. I'm not sure how many generations we have here.

Identified only as "No. 52."

Sunday, November 13, 2011

Four Generations (Unidentified Glass-Plate Image)

8/29/2018 update — At last we have found out who these women are! Clockwise from the upper left: Frances Heidtmann Diedrich (1872-1956); her daughter, Grace Diedrich Rutz (1892-1983); Frances' mother, Sophia Gousloff Heidtmann (1836-1909); and Sophia's mother, Mary Heintz Gousloff (1814-1910). This information comes to us from Diann Van Stright House, who is Grace's granddaughter. We can thus date the photo prior to May 9, 1909, when Sophia died (Indiana Death Certificates) … and since Grace seems to be in her early to mid-teens, probably no earlier than 1905. The Heidtmann family appears in Hobart in the 1880 Census and the 1900 Census (two households), but the surviving members had moved to Hammond by the time the 1910 Census was taken.

Diann adds: "The mysterious lady in the picture frame I am almost positive is Sophia's daughter and Frances' sister, Mary Heidtmann (1867-1887)."



Four Generations 1
(Click on images to enlarge)
Images courtesy of the Hobart Historical Society.


… or is it five? Clockwise from upper left, I think we have mother, daughter, grandmother and great-grandmother, but whose portrait is that on the wall? — great-great-grandmother's? … No, probably not. Her sleeves (woman's in the portrait, I mean) look like the early 1890s, but her face is young. Perhaps she is the mother, 20 years earlier.

This photo is identified only as "No. 53."

The photographer took another shot within a few seconds, probably, identified as "No. 54."

Four Generations 2